Contracts and addresses

All addresses are on Mezo testnet (chain id 31611). Explorer: explorer.test.mezo.org.

Current: main stack

These are the addresses in use. The main stack uses Mezo's own BTC price. JuuSplitter, the series tokens, the P Market pools, JuuSavingsSplitter, JuuPMarket and JuuSwap are shared with the demo stack.

P Market pools (Mezo DEX)

Series tokens

Current: demo stack (DEMO ONLY)

These are the demo addresses in use. A separate set of contracts for showing MUSDash on demand. Its price feed follows Mezo's BTC price unless the owner sets a demo price. It is not connected to the main contracts above.

Earlier demo sets are listed under Retired below.

Retired contracts (do not use)

RETIRED. None of these is used by the app, the Data API or the keeper. Some tests below ran on them.

Mezo contracts Juu calls

Transactions that show each part working

Splitter

The first non-zero reward collection is expected after Thursday 19 November 2026, when Mezo pays the first week of votes.

Bank

That test ran with the target ratio temporarily at 160%, because the test wallet held too little BTC for a 300% loan. The ratio was set back to 300% afterwards: 0xa8f3f1858cc8c37d1d9033b5e5738c23959e8b79c2a5d0d3434117309ce6cd85.

The Bank then opened its loan at 300% with 0.09 BTC: deposit 0x72853df93b12e03fa3cdd90103d58d7b7d1409da15193b6fea2ad0167c301639, open 0x96d09de019acd0861370c4e1b95c75c68dee4b9fe60d525fedf143094e4a50d2.

MUSDash v1 (main, Mezo's real BTC price)

Bank v4 and MUSDash v2 (main, Mezo's real BTC price)

The weekly yield figure is testnet's sMUSD gauge payout last week (22,047 MUSD) divided by the gauge's current vote weight (6.18). Testnet rewards are far higher than real ones.

After those trades the player held 0.0009937 P and 0.0009956 Y (the rest paid fees through the Bank), and the game contract held no tokens or MUSD.

MUSDash v1 (first demo set, demo price)

What the demo shows, in MUSD: #3 was worth 3.00 at the collapse, under its 6.00 line (2% of 300). The 3.00 penalty went 1.50 to #1 (the only Bull survivor), 0.75 to the Buffer and 0.75 to the Bank; the Bank also took #3's 27.00 loss. #2 was paid 126.70 (worth 127.00, minus a 0.30 fee), with the 27.00 gain paid by the Bank. #1 was paid 74.05 (worth 72.85, plus 1.50 survivor reward, minus a 0.30 fee). Afterwards the game contract held 0 MUSD.

P Market (main)

sMUSD door (main)

Juu Agents (demo)

Refused as expected (simulated, no transaction): a 40 MUSD bet with a 30 MUSD limit (BetTooBig), floor 6 with a floor-5 limit (FloorTooHigh), any action after revoke (NoSession), any open after the daily realised loss stop (StoppedForToday).

Loop (demo)

Climb Premium (demo, 15-minute epochs)

Jackpot (demo, 15-minute epochs, run by the keeper)

The epoch before had positions open at the draw, so the Buffer was below its 5% target and the draw was skipped (0x82cd30164e09f88a0c9e007fc073faddfc7550d0d93befbb53bb31786e612b36).

Agents with the Climb Premium and the Loop

Cash reserve and Bank cash check (v5 / v4)

Juu account (Door 3, main)

Survivors and funding over three hours (first demo set, MUSDash v1 0x756e4aA5a229bEB93591785CaB6dEd40a121E376)

Four Bulls (A 150, B 100, V 200 at 10x, and C 120 opened 90 minutes later by a second wallet) and one Bear (D 200) were held for about three hours at a fixed demo price.

• Funding: each position's funding matched the formula k x (bull - bear) / (bull + bear) per hour, rebuilt independently segment by segment (the rate rose from 0.00385% to 0.00481% an hour when C opened), within 0.04% to 0.35%. The small gaps are the seconds between reading each position. Bulls paid 0.0676 MUSD, the Bear received 0.0261, and the 0.0415 difference is the funding on the gap, for the Bank.
• Survivors: at a 9% drop V collapsed (0xad1de53ac6c2b8e0b5dc4fa2c5728f2a04dc9ba92c1e999984d9251879b2e941): 0.9868 MUSD to survivors, 0.4934 to the Buffer, 18.52 to the Bank. The survivors' share split by size x seconds held exactly as expected: A 0.477020, B 0.317695, C 0.192092 (C less per MUSD of size because it held for a shorter time); the Bear got nothing.
• All positions closed afterwards (0x8342c3396b005f7adb1fa471e32d72a6252f35dbe535d674603e6ac050f924cf, 0xa098ca9eecb1e305c0d245fb71ed6f43f732a8ad281230d2d7ce5d713dbf3c48, 0x8ca06004f454e434bbbf941f302a2711662f10a4f887cdd76cf657c40ad2580c, 0xe1c925dbdcf5a5fc47ea243022f1e53f455a7e4f4f766e5807aa0bd4eaef4f81). 1 wei of rounding was left in the game, in the Bank's favour.
• Bad debt (same set): a 10x bet hit by an 11% drop was worth -1.000053 MUSD; the Buffer paid exactly 1.000053 to the Bank (0xe31c29aa3291bbeb025b43ac13ae3eeb995d2f18bb7bc5e21071b8ebdee5bf48).